Q. 1:The number of times in which the composition of team T 2 and the number of times in which composition of team T 4 remained unchanged in two successive months are:
A) (2, 1)
B) (1, 0)
C) (0, 0)
D) (1, 1)
Q. 3: Which of the following CANNOT be the total credit points earned by any employee from the projects?
A) 140
B) 150
C) 170
D) 200
Q. 4: One of the employees named Aneek scored 185 points. Which of the following CANNOT be true?
A) Aneek worked only in teams T1, T2, T3, and T4
B) Aneek worked only in teams T1, T2, T4, and T5
C) Aneek worked only in teams T2, T3, T4, and T5
D) Aneek worked only in teams T1, T3, T4, and T5
Q1: Option (B)
Q2: Option (A)
Q3: Option (B)
Q4: Option (D)
From CAT 2017 – Logical Reasoning – Set, we can infer that,
Number of Special Skilled Employees (SE) = 10
Number of Regular Skilled Employees (RE) = 11
Q1 From CAT 2017 – Logical Reasoning – Set, we can infer that,
The composition of T2 remains unchanged in T2 in 3rd and 4th months. The composition for T4 changes constantly.
Option (B)
Q2 From CAT 2017 – Logical Reasoning – Set, we can infer that,
Number of SE in T1 in third month = 0
Number of SE in T5 in third month = 2
Option (A)
Q3 From CAT 2017 – Logical Reasoning – Set, we can infer that,
Money one person earns in a Challenging Project = 200/5 = 40
Money one person earns in a Standard Project = 100/4 = 25
An employee can earn 140 when they work in one Challenging project and 4 Standard Projects = 40 + 25*4 = 140
An employee can earn 170 when they work in 3 Challenging Projects and 2 Standard Projects = 3*40 + 2*25 = 170
An employee can earn 200 when they work in 5 Challenging Projects = 5*40 = 200
So, option (B) does not seem possible
Q4 From CAT 2017 – Logical Reasoning – Set, we can infer that,
Since Aneek secured 185 credits, he has worked in four challenging projects and one standard project.
Option A: Aneek could have worked in T1 in 1st month (in challenging project), T2 in 2nd month (in challenging project), T3 in 3rd month (in challenging project), T4 in 4th month (in challenging project) and 5th month (in standard project). Hence, this is possible.
Option B: Aneek could have worked in T1 in 1st month (in challenging project), T2 in 2nd month (in challenging project), T4 in 3rd month (in standard project), T4 in 4th month (in challenging project) and T5 in 5th month (in challenging project). Hence, this is possible.
Option C: Aneek could have worked in T2 in 1st month (in standard project), T2 in 2nd month (in challenging project), T3 in 3rd month (in challenging project), T4 in 4th month (in challenging project) and T5 in 5th month (in challenging project). Hence, this is possible.
Option D: Aneek could have worked in T1 in 1st month (in challenging project). He can work in T1 or T5 in the 2nd month. In either case, he cannot work in T3 without working in T2 first. If we assume, he worked in T3 in the 1st month, he could not have worked in four teams in the five months. Similarly, we can rule out the other possibilities. Hence, this is the answer.
Option (D) is the right answer.
Verbal Ability : | Q.01- Q.06 | Q.07- Q.12 | Q.13- Q.18 | Q.19- Q.21 | Q.22- Q.24 | Q.25- Q.29 | Q.30 – Q.34 |
Logical Reasoning : | Q.01- Q.04 | Q.05- Q.08 | Q.09- Q.12 | Q.13- Q.16 | Q.17- Q.20 | Q.21- Q.24 | Q.25 – Q.28 | Q.29 – Q.32 |
Quantitative Aptitude: | Q.01- Q.05 | Q.06- Q.10 | Q.11- Q.15 | Q.16- Q.20 | Q.21- Q.25 | Q.26- Q.30 | Q.31 – Q.34 |
Inspiring Education… Assuring Success!!
Ⓒ 2020 – All Rights Are Reserved