Q. 1: All of the following evidence supports the passage’s explanation of sea travel/trade EXCEPT:
1. archaeological evidence of early sea trade between the ancient peoples of Spain and Ireland via the Atlantic Ocean.
2. the oldest fossil evidence of white-lipped grove snails in Ireland dates back to roughly 9,000 years ago, the time when humans colonised Ireland.
3. absence of genetic variation within the white-lipped grove snails of Ireland and the Pyrenees, whose genes were sampled.
4. the coincidental existence of similar traits in the white-lipped grove snails of Ireland and the Pyrenees because of convergent evolution.
The idea of convergent evolution would weaken the author’s argument of sea travel or trade. The author’s argument is that convergent evolution can be ruled out on the basis of the underlying genetic similarities between the two groups. If the author has ruled out convergent evolution, then it cannot be used as an evidence of the snails’ sea travel. The sea travel has been used as an evidence in support of the purported snails’ migration by sea from Spain to Ireland.
To answer this question, we must carefully understand the main idea of the passage. The passage is about white-lipped grove snails which are found only in Spain and Ireland. The passage focuses on why they are found only in these two places. The author seems to have ruled out a no of possibilities and has zeroed down on the migration theory, through which he suggests that the snails might have migrated on the ships or boats of seafarers who might have carried them as eatables. If humans routinely ate these types of snails before the advent of agriculture, then we can conclude statement 3 which says that seafarers might have carried white-lipped grove snails with them as edibles.
Q. 3:Which one of the following makes the author eliminate convergent evolution as a probable explanation for why white-lipped grove snails are found in Ireland and the Pyrenees?
1. The absence of genetic similarities between white-lipped grove snails of Ireland and snails from other parts of Europe, especially Britain.
2. The distinct lineage of white-lipped grove snails found specifically in Ireland and the Pyrenees.
3. The absence of genetic variation between white-lipped grove snails of Ireland and the Pyrenees.
4. The coincidental evolution of similar traits (white-lipped shell) in the grove snails of Ireland and the Pyrenees.
This point has come in the passage. The idea of convergent evolution has been eliminated by the author because there are genetic similarities between the two groups found in two different countries. Presence of genetic similarities means absence of genetic variation. Thus option 3 is the best choice. Option 1 is just the opposite. Absence of genetic similarities would support convergent evolution.
Q. 4:The passage outlines several hypotheses and evidence related to white-lipped grove snails to arrive at the most convincing explanation for:
1. how the white-lipped variety of grove snails independently evolved in Ireland and the Pyrenees.
2. how the white-lipped variety of grove snails might have migrated from the Pyrenees to Ireland.
3. why the white-lipped variety of grove snails are found only in Ireland and the Pyrenees.
4. why the white-lipped variety of grove snails were wiped out everywhere except in Ireland and the Pyrenees.
We have to understand the question to arrive at the right answer. The question speaks about several hypotheses. On the basis of ‘several hypotheses’ and ‘the central idea of the passage’, we can shortlist two choices. The central idea is about why the white-lipped grove snails are found only in two places. The wiped out idea in option 4 is nowhere mentioned in the passage. So we can eliminate choice 4. Since there is no independent evolution of the two, we cannot choose
option 1. We must not forget that convergent evolution and independent evolution are one and the same thing.
We are left with two choices only. The first is why the white-lipped grove snails are found only in these two places, and the second is how they might have migrated. The migration theory is a tempting choice, but there are not several hypotheses for this. There is only one hypothesis for the migration theory: the snails might have travelled on boats of seafarers, who might have carried them as eatables.
But there are several hypotheses, some rejected while some improbable, why the snails are found only in these two places. In fact, the whole passage seems to be discussing this idea only. Thus, choice 3 is the best answer.