Q. 1: From the passage it can be inferred that cities are good places to live in for all of the following reasons EXCEPT that they:
1. help prevent destruction of the environment.
2. offer employment opportunities.
3. contribute to the cultural transformation of residents.
4. have suburban areas as well as office areas.
This passage is written in a narrative style conducive to a magazine article. In this passage, the author discusses the advantages that cities and urban settlements have on the environment. In slums, there are vast recycling industries of almost every material conceivable and most people travel on environmentally friendly modes of transport such as rickshaws or bicycles or on foot.
The author quotes Calthorpe who is of the opinion that cities are the environmentally most benign form of human settlement since each city dweller consumes less land, less energy, less water, and produces less pollution than his counterpart in settlements of lower densities. The concentration of population and enterprises in urban areas greatly reduces the unit cost of piped water, sewers, drains, roads, electricity, garbage collection, transport, health care, and schools.
The author though also offers some disadvantages of cities. They concentrate crime, pollution, disease and injustice as much as business, innovation, education and entertainment. However, he ends the passage by stating another advantage that cities possess; they have a transformative effect on people.
The passage clearly implies that cities are relatively more “green” than other less densely populated areas. Therefore, option 1 can be inferred and is not the correct answer.
Cities do offer employment opportunities. Refer to paragraph 6. Thus, option 2 can also be inferred and is eliminated.
Cities do contribute to the “transformation” of residents. Thus, option 3 can also be inferred and is also eliminated.
Option 4 has not been mentioned in the passage at all. The passage has not demarcated cities into suburban and office areas. Therefore, option 4 cannot be inferred and is the correct answer.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Option 1 is incorrect as “violent crime” does not have an adverse impact on the environment.
Option 2 is also incorrect as “the rapid spread of diseases” does not directly impact upon the environment.
Option 3 is the correct answer. If the high density of cities leads to an increase in carbon dioxide and global warming then it would undermine the author’s assertion that cities are relatively environmentally benign.
Option 4 is also incorrect. Increased cost of utilities is not likely to have an adverse impact on the environment.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Q. 3: We can infer that Calthorpe’s statement “still jars” with most people because most people:
1. consider cities to be very crowded and polluted.
2. do not regard cities as good places to live in.
3. regard cities as places of disease and crime.
4. do not consider cities to be eco-friendly places.
Refer to the relevant extract in paragraph 3, ‘In his 1985 article, Calthorpe made a statement that still jars with most people: “The city is the most environmentally benign form of human settlement. Each city dweller consumes less land, less energy, less water, and produces less pollution than his counterpart in settlements of lower densities.”’ This statement jars with most people because the conventional wisdom up until that time was that cities were actually very destructive towards the environment. Note that the passage is about the relative benign impact of cities on the environment. This points to option 4 as being the correct answer.
“Crowded”, “polluted”, “disease” and “crime” are characteristics of city life which the author has mentioned as negatives of living in cities but he has gone on to conclude the passage by also stating the positive impacts of living in cities and by suggesting that the positives of living in cities outweigh the negatives. Secondly, these negative facets of city life are not relevant to Calthorpe’s statement which was solely about the environmental impact that cities have. Thus, options 1, 2 and 3 can be eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Q. 4: In the context of the passage, the author refers to Manaus in order to:
1. explain where cities source their labour for factories.
2. explain how urban areas help the environment.
3. describe the infrastructure efficiencies of living in a city.
4. promote cities as employment hubs for people.
The relevant extract in paragraph 5, “[T]he nationally subsidised city of Manaus in northern Brazil “answers the question” of how to stop deforestation: give people decent jobs. Then they can afford houses, and gain security. One hundred thousand people who would otherwise be deforesting the jungle around Manaus are now prospering in town making such things as mobile phones and televisions. . . .” clearly reveals that urbanization has led to less destruction of the environment in Manaus. This points to option 2 as being the correct answer.
Option 1 is incorrect and cannot be inferred from the passage.
Option 3 is also incorrect as the example of Manaus is given to show how jobs and urbanization has led to less destruction of the environment.
All cities are employment hubs for people and not just Manaus. Eliminate option 4.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Q. 5: According to the passage, squatter cities are environment-friendly for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
1. their transportation is energy efficient.
2. they sort out garbage.
3. they recycle material.
4. their streets are kept clean.
Refer to paragraphs 1 and 2 of the passage. Most residents in squatter cities travel on foot, by rickshaw or by bicycle. Therefore, their transportation can be said to be energy efficient. Eliminate option 1.
The author gives the example of the slum at Dharavi which has 30,000 rag pickers and in which six thousand tons of rubbish are sorted every day. Eliminate option 2.
Again the author gives the example of the slum at Dharavi which has 400 recycling units. He goes on to say that every city in Asia and South America has an industry based on gathering old cardboard boxes. Eliminate option 3.
Option 4 has not been stated in the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Verbal Ability : | Q.01- Q.05 | Q.06- Q.10 | Q.11- Q.15 | Q.16- Q.20 | Q.21- Q.24 | Q.25- Q.29 | Q.30 – Q.34 |
Logical Reasoning : | Q.01- Q.04 | Q.05- Q.08 | Q.09- Q.12 | Q.13- Q.16 | Q.17- Q.20 | Q.21- Q.24 | Q.25 – Q.28 | Q.29 – Q.32 |
Quantitative Aptitude: | Q.01- Q.05 | Q.06- Q.10 | Q.11- Q.15 | Q.16- Q.20 | Q.21- Q.25 | Q.26- Q.30 | Q.31 – Q.34 |
Inspiring Education… Assuring Success!!
Ⓒ 2020 – All Rights Are Reserved