MBAP logo

Although one of the most contested concepts in political | CAT VARC Questions- Reading Comprehension

The CAT VARC section has grown increasingly difficult since 2015. In order to tackle the tougher CAT Level VARC questions for the CAT Exam, it is important to understand the basics of Reading Comprehension, Para Jumbles, Para summary, Para completion etc. To obtain a great CAT score, make use of MBAP Free Study material with detailed solutions and video explanations. Check out MBAP free Mock test to take these questions in a test format for free. The purpose of this page is to help you prepare for that. Take a crack at those VARC Section!

You may also find remaining question solution of CAT 2020, slot 3 by searching the question in the search bar.

The question below is from previous year CAT question from CAT 2020 exam comes from CAT Reading Comprehension: Although one of the most contested concepts in political..

Find out by answering this question which tests an aspirant’s CAT VARC skills:

CAT 2020 - Slot 3 - Set 2 - Although one of the most contested concepts in political

Although one of the most contested concepts in political philosophy, human nature is something on which most people seem to agree. By and large, according to Rutger Bregman in his new book Humankind, we have a rather pessimistic view – not of ourselves exactly, but of everyone else. We see other people as selfish, untrustworthy and dangerous and therefore we behave towards them with defensiveness and suspicion. This was how the 17th-century philosopher Thomas Hobbes conceived our natural state to be, believing that all that stood between us and violent anarchy was a strong state and firm leadership.

But in following Hobbes, argues Bregman, we ensure that the negative view we have of human nature is reflected back at us. He instead puts his faith in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the 18th-century French thinker, who famously declared that man was born free and it was civilisation – with its coercive powers, social classes and restrictive laws – that put him in chains.

Hobbes and Rousseau are seen as the two poles of the human nature argument and it’s no surprise that Bregman strongly sides with the Frenchman. He takes Rousseau’s intuition and paints a picture of a prelapsarian idyll in which, for the better part of 300,000 years, Homo sapiens lived a fulfilling life in harmony with nature . . . Then we discovered agriculture and for the next 10,000 years it was all property, war, greed and injustice. . . .

It was abandoning our nomadic lifestyle and then domesticating animals, says Bregman, that brought about infectious diseases such as measles, smallpox, tuberculosis, syphilis, malaria, cholera and plague. This may be true, but what Bregman never really seems to get to grips with is that pathogens were not the only things that grew with agriculture – so did the number of humans. It’s one thing to maintain friendly relations and a property-less mode of living when you’re 30 or 40 hunter-gatherers following the food. But life becomes a great deal more complex and knowledge far more extensive when there are settlements of many thousands.

“Civilisation has become synonymous with peace and progress and wilderness with war and decline,” writes Bregman. “In reality, for most of human existence, it was the other way around.” Whereas traditional history depicts the collapse of civilisations as “dark ages” in which everything gets worse, modern scholars, he claims, see them more as a reprieve, in which the enslaved gain their freedom and culture flourishes. Like much else in this book, the truth is probably somewhere between the two stated positions.

In any case, the fear of civilisational collapse, Bregman believes, is unfounded. It’s the result of what the Dutch biologist Frans de Waal calls “veneer theory” – the idea that just below the surface, our bestial nature is waiting to break out. . . . There’s a great deal of reassuring human decency to be taken from this bold and thought-provoking book and a wealth of evidence in support of the contention that the sense of who we are as a species has been deleteriously distorted. But it seems equally misleading to offer the false choice of Rousseau and Hobbes when, clearly, humanity encompasses both.

Q. 6: The author has differing views from Bregman regarding:

1. the role of pathogens in the spread of infectious diseases.
2. a civilised society being coercive and unjust.
3. a property-less mode of living being socially harmonious.
4. the role of agriculture in the advancement of knowledge.

Correct Answer: 2

The passage presents the two poles of the human nature argument posed by Hobbbes and Rousseau and asserts that “truth is probably somewhere between the two stated positions”. Bregman believes civilisation is synonymous with war and decline and wilderness with peace and progress; the author disagrees.

Q. 7: According to the passage, the “collapse of civilisations” is viewed by Bregman as:

1. a sign of regression in society’s trajectory. 
2. resulting from a breakdown in the veneer of human nature. 
3. a time that enables changes in societies and cultures.
4. a temporary phase which can be rectified by social action.

Correct Answer: 3

According to the passage, Bregman sees the collapse of civilizations “more as a reprieve, in which the enslaved gain their freedom and culture flourishes.” In other words, he sees it as a time that enables changes in societies and cultures.

Q. 8: None of the following views is expressed in the passage EXCEPT that:

1. Hobbes and Rousseau disagreed on the fundamental nature of humans, but both believed in the need for a strong state. 
2. Bregman agrees with Hobbes that firm leadership is needed to ensure property rights and regulate strife.
3. the author of the review believes in the veneer theory of human nature.   
4. most people agree with Hobbes’ pessimistic view of human nature as being intrinsically untrustworthy and selfish.

Correct Answer: 4

The only statement that matches the views in the passage is 4. In the first paragraph, the passage states, “By and large… we have a rather pessimistic view – not of ourselves exactly, but of everyone else….This was how the 17th-century philosopher Thomas Hobbes conceived our natural state to be..”

Q. 9: According to the author, the main reason why Bregman contrasts life in pre-agricultural societies with agricultural societies is to:

1. advocate the promotion of less complex societies as a basis for greater security and prosperity.
2. bolster his argument that people are basically decent, but progress as we know it can make them selfish.
3. highlight the enormous impact that settled farming had on population growth.   
4. make the argument that an environmentally conscious lifestyle is a more harmonious way of living.

Correct Answer: 2

According to the author, Bregman “paints a picture of a prelapsarian idyll in which, for the better part of 300,000 years, Homo sapiens lived a fulfilling life in harmony with nature . . . Then we discovered agriculture and for the next 10,000 years it was all property, war, greed and injustice”. Thus, Bregman, according to the author, portrays agriculture and progress as the root cause for greed and selfishness.

Past Year Question Paper & Solutions

Counselling Session
By IIM Mentor

Reach Us

primary Menu

Inspiring Education… Assuring Success!!
Ⓒ 2020 – All Rights Are Reserved

Free Content !!!
Signup now to get the All recent CAT Exam Paper with Solution... Subscribe below with your Email ID
Free Content !!!
Signup now to get the All recent CAT Exam Paper with Solution... Subscribe below with your Email ID