MBAP logo

There is a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming | CAT VARC Questions- Reading Comprehension

The CAT VARC section has grown increasingly difficult since 2015. In order to tackle the tougher CAT Level VARC questions for the CAT Exam, it is important to understand the basics of Reading Comprehension, Para Jumbles, Para summary, Para completion etc. To obtain a great CAT score, make use of MBAP Free Study material with detailed solutions and video explanations. Check out MBAP free Mock test to take these questions in a test format for free. The purpose of this page is to help you prepare for that. Take a crack at those VARC Section!

You may also find remaining question solution of CAT 2020, slot 3 by searching the question in the search bar.

The question below is from previous year CAT question from CAT 2020 exam comes from CAT Reading Comprehension: There is a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming..

Find out by answering this question which tests an aspirant’s CAT VARC skills:

CAT 2020 - Slot 3 - Set 3 - There is a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming

[There is] a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming a luxury good. As more screens appear in the lives of the poor, screens are disappearing from the lives of the rich. The richer you are, the more you spend to be off-screen. . .

The joy — at least at first — of the internet revolution was its democratic nature. Facebook is the same Facebook whether you are rich or poor. Gmail is the same Gmail. And it’s all free. There is something mass market and unappealing about that. And as studies show that time on these advertisement-support platforms is unhealthy, it all starts to seem déclassé, like drinking soda or smoking cigarettes, which wealthy people do less than poor people. The wealthy can afford to opt out of having their data and their attention sold as a product. The poor and middle class don’t have the same kind of resources to make that happen.

Screen exposure starts young. And children who spent more than two hours a day looking at a screen got lower scores on thinking and language tests, according to early results of a landmark study on brain development of more than 11,000 children that the National Institutes of Health is supporting. Most disturbingly, the study is finding that the brains of children who spend a lot of time on screens are different. For some kids, there is premature thinning of their cerebral cortex. In adults, one study found an association between screen time and depression. . .

Tech companies worked hard to get public schools to buy into programs that required schools to have one laptop per student, arguing that it would better prepare children for their screen-based future. But this idea isn’t how the people who actually build the screen-based future raise their own children. In Silicon Valley, time on screens is increasingly seen as unhealthy. Here, the popular elementary school is the local Waldorf School, which promises a back-to-nature, nearly screen-free education. So as wealthy kids are growing up with less screen time, poor kids are growing up with more. How comfortable someone is with human engagement could become a new class marker.

Human contact is, of course, not exactly like organic food . . . . But with screen time, there has been a concerted effort on the part of Silicon Valley behemoths to confuse the public. The poor and the middle class are told that screens are good and important for them and their children. There are fleets of psychologists and neuroscientists on staff at big tech companies working to hook eyes and minds to the screen as fast as possible and for as long as possible. And so human contact is rare...

There is a small movement to pass a “right to disconnect” bill, which would allow workers to turn their phones off, but for now a worker can be punished for going offline and not being available. There is also the reality that in our culture of increasing isolation, in which so many of the traditional gathering places and social structures have disappeared, screens are filling a crucial void.

Q. 10: Which of the following statements about the negative effects of screen time is the author least likely to endorse?

1. It can cause depression in viewers.
2. It increases human contact as it fills an isolation void.
3. It is shown to have adverse effects on young children’s learning.
4. It is designed to be addictive.

Correct Answer: 2

The author discusses the negative effects of screen time and mentions the fact that it causes depression in adults, that it has adverse effects on children’s learning and that it is designed to be addictive. The author is unlikely to endorse the view that screen time increases human contact, as it fills a void.

Q. 11: The statement “The richer you are, the more you spend to be off-screen” is supported by which other line from the passage?

1. “. . . studies show that time on these advertisement-support platforms is unhealthy . . .”
2. “Gmail is the same Gmail. And it’s all free.” 
3. “How comfortable someone is with human engagement could become a new class marker.”
4. “. . . screens are filling a crucial void.”

Correct Answer: 3

The given statement implies that the class you belong to decides how much time you spend off-screen. Screen time, according to the passage is “déclassé”. Option 3 states the same idea.

Q. 12: The author is least likely to agree with the view that the increase in screen-time is fuelled by the fact that:

1. screens provide social contact in an increasingly isolating world.
2. some workers face punitive action if they are not online.
3. with falling costs, people are streaming more content on their devices.
4. there is a growth in computer-based teaching in public schools.

Correct Answer: 3

While discussing the increase in screen-time, author states that “in our culture of increasing isolation”, screens are filling a “crucial void”. According to the passage, “for now a worker can be punished for going offline” . The passage also states that public schools have been convinced that it is good to “prepare children for their screen- based future”. So, the author is likely to agree with the reasons stated in options 1, 2 and 4. The author does not discuss falling costs of streaming as a reason for increase in screen-time.

Q. 13: The author claims that Silicon Valley tech companies have tried to “confuse the public” by:

1. promoting screen time in public schools while opting for a screen-free education for their own children.
2. developing new work-efficiency programmes while lobbying for the “right to disconnect” bill.
3. concealing the findings of psychologists and neuroscientists on screen-time use from the public.
4. pushing for greater privacy while working with advertisement-support platforms to mine data.

Correct Answer: 1

In paragraph 4, the author states that people who actually build a screen-based future do not raise their own children that way: “In Silicon Valley, time on screens is increasingly seen as unhealthy. Here, the popular elementary school is the local Waldorf School, which promises a back-to-nature, nearly screen-free education.”

Past Year Question Paper & Solutions

Counselling Session
By IIM Mentor

Reach Us

primary Menu

Inspiring Education… Assuring Success!!
Ⓒ 2020 – All Rights Are Reserved

Free Content !!!
Signup now to get the All recent CAT Exam Paper with Solution... Subscribe below with your Email ID
Free Content !!!
Signup now to get the All recent CAT Exam Paper with Solution... Subscribe below with your Email ID